Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

MEDIASI Jurnal Kajian dan Terapan Media, Bahasa, Komunikasi aims to publish articles related to the latest developments in communication science, media, and language studies in the creative industries.

COMMUNICATION STUDIES 

  • Group Communication
  • Organizational Communication
  • Mass Communication
  • Cultural Communication
  • Political Communication
  • Marketing Communication
  • Branding
  • Advertising
  • Public Relations
  • Popular Culture
  • Journalism

MEDIA STUDIES

  • Social Media 
  • Digital Media
  • Politic and Economy Media
  • Learning Media and Apps
  • Mass Media
  • Public Media 
  • Photography
  • Film
  • Music
  • Animation
  • Interactive Game
  • Media Design
  • Art Design

LANGUAGE STUDIES

  • Journalistics
  • Literature
  • Adaptation Work
  • Critical Discourse Analysis
  • Literacy
  • Text
  • Creative Writing
  • Translation
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Lexicography
  • Comparative Linguistics
  • Anthropolinguistics
  • Pragmatics

 

Section Policies

Artikel

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to MEDIASI must follow focus and scope, and author guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Turnitin software.

The research article submitted to MEDIASI will be double blind review by two Reviewers. The Reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript. Final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers comments.

 

Publication Frequency

MEDIASI is published three times in a year, namely in January, May, dan September.

 

Open Access Policy

MEDIASI provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. 

This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative. 

 

Archiving

MEDIASI utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.

 

Policy of Screening for Plagiarism

All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in MEDIASI by using a Turnitin software. The tolerance limit for the level of similarity of scientific article manuscripts is a maximum of 20%.

 

Publication Ethics

Section A: Publication and Authorship 

  1. All submitted papers are subject to a peer review process by two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review process is blind peer review.
  3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability, and language.
  4. The possible decisions include Accept Submission, Revisions Required, Resubmit for Review, or Decline Submission.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Declined articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication. 

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
  4. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  5. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  6. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  7. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  8. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  9. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.
  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of research’s funding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.