Tradisi Bahandipan sebagai Bentuk Komunikasi Budaya Kolektif Petani Sawah di Desa Gudang Hirang

Muhammad Yakub Amin; Muhammad Alif

doi:10.46961/mediasi.v7i1.1795

Authors

Muhammad Yakub Amin Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9337-7417
Muhammad Alif Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9142-9464

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46961/mediasi.v7i1.1795

Abstract

Bahandipan tradition is a form of mutual cooperation unique to the Banjar community, which is now gradually being eroded by modernization. More than just an agricultural practice, this tradition serves as a medium of collective cultural communication that strengthens solidarity among farmers in Gudang Hirang Village. This study aims to understand the role of the bahandipan tradition as a form of collective cultural communication, using a qualitative approach and phenomenological method through interviews, observation, and documentation involving farmer group leaders, local historians, and village farmers. Utilizing Symbolic Interaction Theory, the study analyzes how social meaning is constructed through interactions within the tradition. The findings reveal that bahandipan functions as both verbal and symbolic communication, reinforcing social networks, the values of mutual cooperation, and consensus-based decision-making without formal structure. Although it is increasingly affected by modern wage-based labor systems, bahandipan remains regarded as a meaningful cultural heritage worth preserving in the context of development rooted in local wisdom.

References

Athens, L. (2005). Mead’s lost conception of society. Symbolic Interaction, 28(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2005.28.3.305

Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2023). Symbolic interactionism. Encyclopedia of Health Research in the Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract1973232

Díez-Palomar, J., García-Carrión, R., Hargreaves, L., & Vieites, M. (2020). Transforming students’ attitudes towards learning through the use of successful educational actions. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0240292. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240292.

Harahap, N. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif. Wal Ashri Publishing.

Haris, A., & Amalia, A. (2018). Makna Dan Simbol Dalam Proses Interaksi Sosial (Sebuah Tinjauan Komunikasi). Jurnal Dakwah Risalah, 29(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.24014/jdr.v29i1.5777

Hastuti, K. P., Sumarmi, S., Budijanto, B., & Utomo, D. H. (2019). Etno-Agrikultur Suku Banjar di Lahan Rawa Pasang Surut (p. 53). Media Nusa Creative.

Ideham, M. S., Sjarifuddin, S., Anis, Z. A., & Wajidi, W. (2005). Urang Banjar dan Kebudayaannya. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Daerah Kalimantan Selatan.

Jatmika, D. (2018). Hubungan Budaya Individualis-Kolektif Dan Motivasi Berbelanja Hedonik Pada Masyarakat Kota Jakarta. Jurnal Psikologi Psibernetika, 10(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.30813/psibernetika.v10i1.1037

Lisnawati, & Ahmad, S. (2023). Kada Balampu, Menyisir Sisi Tapih: Eksplorasi Nilai Islami Dalam Kearifan Lokal Urang Banjar. Jurnal El-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Pranata Sosial, 9(2), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qanuniy.v9i2.8578

Mead, G. H. (1962). Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (C. W. Morris, Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

Mutiah, M. (2017). Membangun Sistem Komunikasi Indonesia Yang Kolektif Lewat Media Tradisional. The Journal of Society & Media, 1(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v1n2.p75-85

Nasir, A., Nurjana, Shah, K., Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2023). Pendekatan Fenomenologi Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(5), 4445–4451. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/5224

Nasrullah, R. (2018). Komunikasi Antar Budaya: Di Era Budaya Siber. Prenada Media.

Nengsih, S. W. (2016). Tatangar Banjar Sebagai Ekspresi Sistem Kognisi Masyarakat Banjar. UNDAS: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Bahasa Dan Sastra, 12(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.26499/und.v12i1.552

Nurudin. (2016). Imu Komunikasi: Ilmiah Dan Populer. PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Prasetyono, D. W., Astuti, S. J. W., Supriyanto, & Syahrial, R. (2017). Pemberdayaan Petani Berbasis Modal Sosial dan Kelembagaan. AJIE-Asian Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 02(03), 231–238. https://journal.uii.ac.id/ajie/article/view/8387

Ragawa, E. R. (2023). Pembentukan budaya kolektif dalam komunitas penggemar pakaian vintage. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta..

Rohim, S. (2016). Teori Komunikasi Perspektiif, Ragam dan Aplikasi. Rineka Cipta.

Roudhonah. (2019). Ilmu Komunikasi. Depok: Pt Rajagrafindo Persada

Ruliana, P., & Lestari, P. (2021). Teori Komunikasi. Depok: Pt Rajagrafindo Persada.

Rustandi, E., & Nuryanto, Y. (2024). Etika Komunikasi Budaya Kolektif Aparatur Pemerintahan Di Desa Waluya Kabupaten Bandung Jawa Barat. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 7(3), 6272–6278

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. ALFABETA.

Sumarto, S. (2019). Budaya, Pemahaman dan Penerapannya. Jurnal Literasiologi, 1(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.47783/literasiologi.v1i2.49

Sumitro, S., Oruh, S., Kamaruddin, S. A., & Agustang, A. (2022). Solidaritas Sosial Komunitas Masyarakat Nelayan Pulau Liukang Loe di Desa Bira. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 11(3), 490–499. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v11i3.46128

Suwanmaneepong, S., Llones, C., Mankeb, P., & Wongtragoon, U. (2024). Participatory irrigation management, social capital, and efficiency in rice production: Understanding the linkage in the case of irrigated rice farms in Northern Thailand. Heliyon, 10(11), e32301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32301

Wahyu. (2020). Kearifan Lokal dalam Perspektif Budaya Banjar. Cross-Border, 3(2), 226–240. https://journal.iaisambas.ac.id/index.php/Cross-Border/article/view/740

Yuvita, R., & Alif, M. (2025). Communication acts in traditional rituals of the Banjar community Batatamba. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 21(1), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v21i1.12412