Linguistic Features and Generic Structures in Discussion Writing: A Case Study at Politeknik Negeri Media Kreatif

Authors

  • Liza Amalia Putri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46961/jip.v8i1.58

Keywords:

linguistic features, generic structures, discussion writing

Abstract

What kind of linguistic features and generic structures do the students of Politeknik Negeri Media Kreatif use in their discussion writing? This study aims at analyzing the linguistic features and generic structures found in the students’ writing. The SFL Theory of Genre covering linguistic features and generic structures by Gerot and Wigmel is used to analyze the data. The study uses the descriptive qualitative research method and analyzes the writing of the students who have learned how to write discussion essay. The finding is that the dominant linguistic feature of all the texts is the generic human and non-human participants. All students follow the rules of writing: the generic structure, the arguments for, the arguments against and the conclusion or recommendation. The students have put all linguistic features in their discussion writing.

References

Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Fourth Ed. Lincoln: Sage Publications.

Elashri, Ismail Ibrahim Elishirbini Abd-Elfatah. (2013). The Effect of the Genre-Based Approach to Teaching Writing on the EFL Al-Azhr Secondary Students’ Writing Skills and Their Attitude Towards Writing. Mansoura: Mansoura University.

Gerot, Linda and Wignel, Peter. (1995). Making Sense of Functional Grammar: An ​Introductory Workbook. Sydney Antipodean Educational Enterprises.

Hinkel, Eli. (2002). Second Language Writer Text: Linguistic and Rhetorical Features. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hyland, Ken. (2002). Teaching and Researching Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Luu, Tuan Trong. (2011). Teaching Writing Through Genre Based Approach. BELT Journal, Vol. 2 No.1 (p.121-136).Richards, Jack C. (1990). The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., and Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A ​Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications.

Na, Ding Eng. (2007). Genre-Based Approach to Teaching Writing. ICTL Journal.

Paltridge, Brian. (2001). Genre and Language Learning Classroom. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Putri, L.A. and Bustos, J. (2018). Assessing the Process Not Just the Message: A Cursory View of Student Assessment, International Journal of Cultural and Art Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (p. 19-27).

Putri, L.A. and Clayton, K. (2020). The Identity Issue of the Colonized and the Colonizer in Cloud Nine by Caryl Churchill, International Journal of Cultural and Art Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (p. 1-8).

Sinar, T.S., Putri, L.A., Putri, D.M., (2019). Self-Assessment and Reflection in Portofolios Enhancing EFL Students’ Writing. Elementary School Journal Vol. 9 No. 4 (p. 309-318).

Downloads

Published

2020-08-30

How to Cite

Putri, L. A. (2020). Linguistic Features and Generic Structures in Discussion Writing: A Case Study at Politeknik Negeri Media Kreatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Publipreneur, 8(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.46961/jip.v8i1.58

Citation Check